Brain Topography

52.6k citations
1.6k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
    • Neural dynamics and brain function
    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
    • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
    • Neuroscience and Music Perception
    • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Neurology top 5%
    • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Papers in

    • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 590
    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 566
    • Neural dynamics and brain function 560
    • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 222
    • Neuroscience and Music Perception 130
    • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies 120

Brain Topography

1.5k papers receiving 50.5k citations

Peers

Brain Topography
Comparison fields: 5 of 213
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 37.1k
  • Neurology 4.9k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 5.6k
  • Sensory Systems 1.8k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 5.0k
Replace Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section with:
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section United States
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience United States
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology United States
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics United States
BMC Neuroscience United States
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience United States
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience United States
Neurophysiologie Clinique France
The Neuroscientist United States
Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience United States
Brain Topography relative to Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section United States Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Brain Topography

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Brain Topography. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Brain Topography with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brain Topography more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Brain Topography

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Brain Topography. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Brain Topography.

About Brain Topography

The 1.6k papers published in Brain Topography in the last decades have received a total of 52.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Brain Topography usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (1.3k papers), Neurology (154 papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (284 papers), Signal Processing (136 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (151 papers) specifically the topics of EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (590 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (566 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (560 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (222 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (171 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (130 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (127 papers) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (120 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Brain Topography are Christoph M. Michel, Michael Scherg, Wolfgang Skrandies, Álvaro Pascual‐Leone, Carlos Schönfeldt‐Lecuona, Micah M. Murray, Uwe Herwig, Denis Brunet, Paul L. Nunez and Patrick Berg.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact