Human Brain Mapping

392.7k citations
6.7k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
    • Neural dynamics and brain function
    • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
    • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
    • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
    • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
    • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Papers in

    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 3.1k
    • Neural dynamics and brain function 1.5k
    • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 999
    • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 849
    • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism 428
    • Visual perception and processing mechanisms 371
    • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications 1.7k
    • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications 1.0k

Human Brain Mapping

6.4k papers receiving 380.8k citations

Peers

Human Brain Mapping
Comparison fields: 5 of 235
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 243.6k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 76.0k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 45.5k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 43.7k
  • Neurology 25.3k
Replace Cerebral Cortex with:
Cerebral Cortex United States
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience United States
Neuroreport United States
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology United States
Nature reviews. Neuroscience United States
Journal of Applied Physiology United States
Neuropsychologia United States
Cortex United States
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience United States
Clinical Neurophysiology United States
Human Brain Mapping relative to Cerebral Cortex United States Cerebral Cortex's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Cerebral Cortex · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Human Brain Mapping

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Human Brain Mapping. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Human Brain Mapping with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human Brain Mapping more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Human Brain Mapping

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Human Brain Mapping. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Human Brain Mapping.

About Human Brain Mapping

The 6.7k papers published in Human Brain Mapping in the last decades have received a total of 392.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Human Brain Mapping usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (5.0k papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (2.2k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (744 papers), Neurology (446 papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (742 papers) specifically the topics of Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3.1k papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (1.7k papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (1.5k papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (1.0k papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (999 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (849 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (428 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (371 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Human Brain Mapping are Stephen M. Smith, Karl Friston, Andrew P. Holmes, Thomas E. Nichols, Peter T. Fox, R. S. J. Frackowiak, Anders M. Dale, Keith J. Worsley, Vince D. Calhoun and Angela R. Laird.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact