Anna C. Brady

22 papers receiving 410 citations

Peers

Anna C. Brady
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 141
  • Computer Science Applications 40
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 87
  • Education 161
  • Social Psychology 112
Replace Lauren D. Goegan with:
Lauren D. Goegan Canada
Karim Shateri Iran
Elisabeth Pelikan Austria
Silke Hertel Germany
Jeffrey Hugh Gamble Taiwan
Kira Elena Weber Germany
Fatih Yavuz Türkiye
Virginie Hospel Belgium
Keiko C. P. Bostwick Australia
Evangelia Karagiannopoulou Greece
Anna C. Brady relative to Lauren D. Goegan Canada Lauren D. Goegan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Lauren D. Goegan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna C. Brady

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna C. Brady's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna C. Brady with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna C. Brady more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna C. Brady

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna C. Brady. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna C. Brady. The network helps show where Anna C. Brady may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Anna C. Brady, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna C. Brady Line = papers co-authored together Anna C. Brady links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020153
2 202046
3 201837
4 201837
5 202328
6 202120
7 202016
8 202015
9 202212
10 202312
11 202111
12 202111
13 202110
14 20207
15 20226
16 20224
17 20214
18 20224
19 20242
20 20212

About Anna C. Brady

Anna C. Brady is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 439 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (7 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (6 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (5 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (5 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (4 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (4 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (4 papers) and Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (141 citations), Computer Science Applications (40 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (87 citations), Education (161 citations) and Social Psychology (112 citations). Anna C. Brady has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Christopher A. Wolters, Yeo‐eun Kim, Lauren Hensley, Douglas A. Dennis, Jason M. Jennings, Sungjun Won, Daniel H. Robinson, Carlton J. Fong, Marlynn M. Griffin and Raymond H. Kim. Their work appears in journals such as Educational Psychology Review, The Journal of Arthroplasty, Journal of College Reading and Learning, Arthroplasty Today and Learning and Individual Differences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact