Anna C. Brady

28 papers receiving 571 citations

Peers

Anna C. Brady
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 157
  • Computer Science Applications 48
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 93
  • Education 177
  • Social Psychology 111
Replace Steven R. Wininger with:
Steven R. Wininger United States
Pete Van Mullem United States
Kira Elena Weber Germany
Markus Mattsson Finland
Rolland Viau Canada
Lori Andersen United States
Joost Meijer Netherlands
Manuela Tomai Italy
Ilja Cornelisz Netherlands
Cassie Freeman United States
Anna C. Brady relative to Steven R. Wininger United States Steven R. Wininger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×16×
Steven R. Wininger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna C. Brady

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna C. Brady's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna C. Brady with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna C. Brady more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna C. Brady

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna C. Brady. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna C. Brady. The network helps show where Anna C. Brady may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna C. Brady, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna C. Brady Line = papers co-authored together Anna C. Brady links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020169
2 202189
3 202053
4 201840
5 201838
6 202331
7 202126
8 202019
9 202017
10 202316
11 202214
12 202112
13 202111
14 202111
15 202210
16 20208
17 20226
18 20225
19 20224
20 20214

About Anna C. Brady

Anna C. Brady is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Education and Clinical Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 594 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (7 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (7 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (5 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (5 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (3 papers), Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation (3 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (157 citations), Computer Science Applications (48 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (93 citations), Education (177 citations) and Social Psychology (111 citations). Anna C. Brady has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Christopher A. Wolters, Yeo‐eun Kim, Lauren Hensley, Jason M. Jennings, Douglas A. Dennis, Sungjun Won, Carlton J. Fong, Marlynn M. Griffin, Daniel H. Robinson and Nicholas J. Kenyon. Their work appears in journals such as Educational Psychology Review, The Journal of Arthroplasty, Learning and Individual Differences, Arthroplasty Today and Journal of College Reading and Learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact