Andrew Wild

540 citations
10 papers · 425 · 1 hit paper · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Andrew Wild

10 papers receiving 405 citations

Andrew Wild's Hit Papers

The development and validation of a learning progression for argumentation in science 2016 · 207 citations
2070+3+6Years since publication50100150200

Peers

Andrew Wild
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 231
  • Education 296
  • Linguistics and Language 33
  • Literature and Literary Theory 50
  • Computer Science Applications 21
Replace Alison Haas with:
Alison Haas United States
Laurie H. Rubel United States
MariAnne George United States
Bing Wei Macao
Martine Méheut France
Joseph A. Martineau United States
Sonja M. Mork Norway
Ashlyn Pierson United States
Ivana Cimermanová Slovakia
Scott E. Grapin United States
Andrew Wild relative to Alison Haas United States Alison Haas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Alison Haas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Wild

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Wild's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Wild with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Wild more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Wild

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Wild. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Wild. The network helps show where Andrew Wild may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Wild, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Wild Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Wild links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1
The development and validation of a learning progression for argumentation in science
Hit paper breakdown →
2016207
2 201581
3 201954
4 201431
5 201516
6 201914
7 20079
8 20186
9 20144
10 20053

About Andrew Wild

Andrew Wild is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organic Chemistry and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 10 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (4 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (4 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (1 paper), Second Language Learning and Teaching (1 paper), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (1 paper), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper) and Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (231 citations), Education (296 citations), Linguistics and Language (33 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (50 citations) and Computer Science Applications (21 citations). Andrew Wild has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Anna MacPherson, Jonathan Osborne, J. Bryan Henderson, Evan Szu, Bryan A. Brown, Jennifer Saltzman, Rachel A. Lotan, Nicole Holthuis, Brian Donovan and R. F. Cooper. Their work appears in journals such as Science Education, International Journal of Science Education, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, The Journal of Organic Chemistry and Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact