Evan Szu
Impact in
-
- Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Education top 5%
- Science Education and Pedagogy
- Education and Critical Thinking Development
- Innovative Teaching Methods
- Online and Blended Learning
- Student Assessment and Feedback
Papers in
-
- Science Education and Pedagogy 4
- Innovative Teaching Methods 2
-
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods 3
- Educational Strategies and Epistemologies 3
- Co-authors
- Jonathan Osborne (4 shared papers)Anna MacPherson (2 shared papers)Andrew Wild (1 shared paper)J. Bryan Henderson (1 shared paper)Richard J. Shavelson (4 shared papers)Kiruthiga Nandagopal (4 shared papers)John H. Penn (4 shared papers)Enrique J. López (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching (3 papers)Public Understanding of Science (1 paper)Journal of Chemical Education (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSingaporeAustralia
In The Last Decade
Evan Szu
8 papers receiving 383 citations
Evan Szu's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 248
- Education 318
- Computer Science Applications 35
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 31
- Safety Research 16
Countries citing papers authored by Evan Szu
This map shows the geographic impact of Evan Szu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evan Szu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evan Szu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Evan Szu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Evan Szu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Evan Szu. The network helps show where Evan Szu may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Evan Szu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The development and validation of a learning progression for argumentation in science Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 207 |
| 2 | 2011 | 55 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 51 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 12 |
About Evan Szu
Evan Szu is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Automotive Engineering and Social Psychology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 407 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Science Education and Pedagogy (4 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (3 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (2 papers), Various Chemistry Research Topics (2 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (1 paper), Complex Systems and Decision Making (1 paper) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (248 citations), Education (318 citations), Computer Science Applications (35 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (31 citations) and Safety Research (16 citations). Evan Szu has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Osborne, Anna MacPherson, Andrew Wild, J. Bryan Henderson, Richard J. Shavelson, Kiruthiga Nandagopal, John H. Penn, Enrique J. López, Alexis Patterson Williams and Maureen A. Scharberg. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Public Understanding of Science and Journal of Chemical Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.