Agnes Weiß
Impact in
- Endocrinology top 5%
- Biotechnology top 5%
- Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
Papers in
- Food Science 22
- Probiotics and Fermented Foods 9
- Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity 7
-
- Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety 13
- Microbial Inactivation Methods 8
- Co-authors
- Herbert Schmidt (35 shared papers)Ruth Freitag (3 shared papers)Valérie Jérôme (3 shared papers)Helmut K. Mayer (3 shared papers)Reinhold Carle (8 shared papers)Martin J. Loessner (2 shared papers)Jochen Weiß (3 shared papers)Monika Gibis (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- European Food Research and Technology (6 papers)Food Microbiology (5 papers)Food and Bioprocess Technology (3 papers)LWT (3 papers)Food Control (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandSaudi Arabia
In The Last Decade
Agnes Weiß
41 papers receiving 706 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Endocrinology 75
- Biotechnology 117
- Food Science 236
- Animal Science and Zoology 87
- Building and Construction 111
Countries citing papers authored by Agnes Weiß
This map shows the geographic impact of Agnes Weiß's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Agnes Weiß with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Agnes Weiß more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Agnes Weiß
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Agnes Weiß. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Agnes Weiß. The network helps show where Agnes Weiß may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Agnes Weiß, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 92 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 83 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 68 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 53 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 23 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 21 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 17 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 15 | Comparison of Selective Media for the Enumeration of Probiotic Enterococci from Animal Feed | 2005 | 16 |
| 16 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 13 |
About Agnes Weiß
Agnes Weiß is a scholar working on Food Science, Biotechnology, Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, having authored 45 papers that have together received 719 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (13 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (9 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (8 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (7 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (6 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (6 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (4 papers) and Escherichia coli research studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (75 citations), Biotechnology (117 citations), Food Science (236 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (87 citations) and Building and Construction (111 citations). Agnes Weiß has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Herbert Schmidt, Ruth Freitag, Valérie Jérôme, Helmut K. Mayer, Reinhold Carle, Martin J. Loessner, Jochen Weiß, Monika Gibis, Jochen Klumpp and Wolfgang Kneifel. Their work appears in journals such as European Food Research and Technology, Food Microbiology, Food and Bioprocess Technology, LWT and Food Control.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.