Countries where authors publish in FEMS Yeast Research
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in FEMS Yeast Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in FEMS Yeast Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites FEMS Yeast Research more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in FEMS Yeast Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in FEMS Yeast Research.
About FEMS Yeast Research
The 2.4k papers published in FEMS Yeast Research in the last decades have received a total of 73.4k indexed citations . Papers published in FEMS Yeast Research usually cover Food Science (584 papers), Molecular Biology (1.9k papers), Aging (38 papers), Cell Biology (341 papers) and Infectious Diseases (282 papers) specifically the topics of Fungal and yeast genetics research (1.2k papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (536 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (489 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (365 papers), Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (277 papers), Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (273 papers), Fungal Infections and Studies (180 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (169 papers). The most active scholars publishing in FEMS Yeast Research are Cletus P. Kurtzman, Isak S. Pretorius, Jack T. Pronk, Jens Nielsen, Christie J. Robnett, Graham H. Fleet, Johan M. Thevelein, Matthias Sipiczki, Antonius J. A. van Maris and Lene Jespersen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.