Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

369.9k citations
4.9k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Biochemistry top 0.2%
    • Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Food Science top 0.2%
    • Proteins in Food Systems
    • Probiotics and Fermented Foods

Papers in

    • Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities 521
    • Proteins in Food Systems 354
    • Probiotics and Fermented Foods 314

Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

4.8k papers receiving 352.6k citations

Peers

Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
  • Biochemistry 43.6k
  • Food Science 122.2k
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 66.9k
  • Animal Science and Zoology 30.6k
  • Biotechnology 24.2k
Replace Foods with:
Foods China
International Journal of Food Science & Technology China
Trends in Food Science & Technology China
European Food Research and Technology Germany
Journal of Food Science and Technology India
Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society United States
Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics United States
Food and Chemical Toxicology United States
Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology United States
Journal of Food Engineering China
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition relative to Foods China Foods's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×33.9×
Foods · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition.

About Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

The 4.9k papers published in Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition in the last decades have received a total of 369.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition usually cover Biochemistry (649 papers), Food Science (1.6k papers), Nutrition and Dietetics (1.2k papers), Biotechnology (369 papers) and Animal Science and Zoology (373 papers) specifically the topics of Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (521 papers), Food composition and properties (386 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (356 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (354 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (323 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (314 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (304 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (280 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition are David Julian McClements, Da‐Wen Sun, Balz Frei, Eric A. Decker, Jianbo Xiao, Fereidoon Shahidi, Krishnapura Srinivasan, Jane V. Higdon, Micha Peleg and Ioannis S. Arvanitoyannis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact