Current Opinion in Biotechnology

334.7k citations
4.6k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
    • Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
    • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
    • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
    • Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects

Papers in

    • Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction 747
    • Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization 331
    • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 308
    • Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects 260
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 229
    • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques 205

Current Opinion in Biotechnology

4.4k papers receiving 319.4k citations

Peers

Current Opinion in Biotechnology
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
  • Biotechnology 25.4k
  • Molecular Biology 173.6k
  • Pollution 25.9k
  • Biomedical Engineering 67.8k
  • Biomaterials 17.9k
Replace Trends in biotechnology with:
Trends in biotechnology United States
Journal of Biotechnology China
Biotechnology Advances China
BioMed Research International China
Biotechnology Letters China
Nature Reviews Microbiology United States
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology China
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects United States
Archives of Microbiology Germany
Microbiology United Kingdom
Current Opinion in Biotechnology relative to Trends in biotechnology United States Trends in biotechnology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Trends in biotechnology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Opinion in Biotechnology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Opinion in Biotechnology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Opinion in Biotechnology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Opinion in Biotechnology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Opinion in Biotechnology.

About Current Opinion in Biotechnology

The 4.6k papers published in Current Opinion in Biotechnology in the last decades have received a total of 334.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Current Opinion in Biotechnology usually cover Molecular Biology (3.0k papers), Biotechnology (374 papers), Biomedical Engineering (878 papers), Biophysics (110 papers) and Pollution (206 papers) specifically the topics of Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (747 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (379 papers), Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (331 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (308 papers), Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (260 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (234 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (229 papers) and Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (205 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Opinion in Biotechnology are Derek R. Lovley, Maria Daglia, François Baneyx, Carl E. Cerniglia, Eliana De Bernardez Clark, Jeffrey A Hubbell, Robert M. Clegg, JENS KVIST NIELSEN, Karl‐Erich Jaeger and Arie Altman.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact