journal for the education of the gifted

17.3k citations
985 papers · · active since 1978

Impact in

    • Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
    • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Education top 5%
    • Problem and Project Based Learning
    • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
    • School Choice and Performance

Papers in

journal for the education of the gifted

909 papers receiving 14.2k citations

Peers

journal for the education of the gifted
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 10.9k
  • Education 4.4k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.6k
  • Safety Research 626
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 109
Replace Gifted Child Today with:
Gifted Child Today United States
Educational Research and Evaluation United States
Journal of Intelligence United States
Australian Journal of Education Australia
Applied Measurement in Education United States
Asia Pacific Education Review South Korea
New Ideas in Psychology United States
Creativity Research Journal United States
Social Psychology of Education United States
The Urban Review United States
journal for the education of the gifted relative to Gifted Child Today United States Gifted Child Today's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Gifted Child Today · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in journal for the education of the gifted

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in journal for the education of the gifted. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in journal for the education of the gifted with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites journal for the education of the gifted more than expected).

Fields of papers published in journal for the education of the gifted

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in journal for the education of the gifted. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in journal for the education of the gifted.

About journal for the education of the gifted

The 985 papers published in journal for the education of the gifted in the last decades have received a total of 17.3k indexed citations . Papers published in journal for the education of the gifted usually cover Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (814 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (84 papers), Education (251 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (72 papers) and Safety Research (36 papers) specifically the topics of Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (790 papers), School Choice and Performance (107 papers), Publishing and Scholarly Communication (82 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (32 papers), Career Development and Diversity (27 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (24 papers), Critical Race Theory in Education (21 papers) and Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in journal for the education of the gifted are Shelagh A. Gallagher, Laurence J. Coleman, Carolyn M. Callahan, Eric L. Mann, Tracy L. Cross, Carol Ann Tomlinson, Joseph S. Renzulli, Tonya R. Moon, Catherine M. Brighton and Paula Olszewski‐Kubilius.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact