Social Psychology of Education

1.1k papers and 22.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Social Psychology of Education in the last decades have received a total of 22.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Social Psychology of Education usually cover Education (602 papers), Social Psychology (569 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (313 papers) specifically the topics of Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (268 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (215 papers) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (193 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social Psychology of Education are Einar M. Skaalvik, Isaac A. Friedman, Sidsel Skaalvik, Rosemary E. Sutton, Sabine Glock, Στέλιος Ν. Γεωργίου, Mary J. Fischer, Robert J. Vallerand, Sue Howard and Bruce Johnson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Social Psychology of Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Social Psychology of Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social Psychology of Education.

Countries where authors publish in Social Psychology of Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social Psychology of Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social Psychology of Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Psychology of Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025