Asia Pacific Education Review

1.2k papers and 14.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Asia Pacific Education Review in the last decades have received a total of 14.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Asia Pacific Education Review usually cover Education (696 papers), Sociology and Political Science (195 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (180 papers) specifically the topics of Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities (130 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (113 papers) and Global Education and Multiculturalism (113 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asia Pacific Education Review are Philip G. Altbach, Mark Bray, Timothy Teo, Lanqin Zheng, Jong‐Suk Kim, Ulrich Teichler, Tae-Young Kim, Jung Cheol Shin, Gita Steiner‐Khamsi and Percy Lai Yin Kwok.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Asia Pacific Education Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asia Pacific Education Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asia Pacific Education Review.

Countries where authors publish in Asia Pacific Education Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asia Pacific Education Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asia Pacific Education Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asia Pacific Education Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025