E-Learning and Digital Media

688 papers and 6.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 688 papers published in E-Learning and Digital Media in the last decades have received a total of 6.7k indexed citations. Papers published in E-Learning and Digital Media usually cover Education (400 papers), Sociology and Political Science (197 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (169 papers) specifically the topics of Online and Blended Learning (202 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (115 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (109 papers). The most active scholars publishing in E-Learning and Digital Media are James Paul Gee, Martin Oliver, Constance Steinkuehler, Rebecca W. Black, Keith Trigwell, Michael A. Peters, Daniel Araya, Sujit Kumar Basak, Paul Bélanger and Marguerite Wotto.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in E-Learning and Digital Media

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in E-Learning and Digital Media. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in E-Learning and Digital Media.

Countries where authors publish in E-Learning and Digital Media

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in E-Learning and Digital Media. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in E-Learning and Digital Media with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E-Learning and Digital Media more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025