International Journal of Services and Standards

1.7k citations
255 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

International Journal of Services and Standards

221 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

International Journal of Services and Standards
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Information Systems and Management 342
  • Management Information Systems 352
  • Marketing 283
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 288
  • Strategy and Management 418
Replace Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences with:
Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences Thailand
Journal of Medical Marketing Device Diagnostic and Pharmaceutical Marketing United States
International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector United States
International Journal of Electronic Customer Relationship Management India
Quantitative Science Studies United States
International Journal of Service Science Management Engineering and Technology India
International Journal for Quality Research Russia
RAUSP Management Journal Brazil
Management & Marketing Romania
Journal of Direct Data and Digital Marketing Practice United Kingdom
International Journal of Services and Standards relative to Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences Thailand Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.8×
Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Services and Standards

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Services and Standards. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Services and Standards with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Services and Standards more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Journal of Services and Standards

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Services and Standards. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Services and Standards.

About International Journal of Services and Standards

The 255 papers published in International Journal of Services and Standards in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of Services and Standards usually cover Management Information Systems (52 papers), Information Systems and Management (39 papers), Marketing (44 papers), Medical Terminology (1 paper) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (44 papers) specifically the topics of Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (39 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (39 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (21 papers), Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (20 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (15 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (15 papers), Quality and Supply Management (14 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (11 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Services and Standards are Alan D. Smith, William L. Smith, Osama Isaac, Adnan Aldholay, Ahmed M. Mutahar, Kai S. Koong, Thomas R. Gulledge, Josu Takala, Ming‐Chang Lee and T. Ramayah.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact