Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies

155.9k citations
3.8k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Biotechnology top 0.5%
    • Microbial Inactivation Methods
    • Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
  • Food Science top 0.5%
    • Microencapsulation and Drying Processes
    • Proteins in Food Systems
    • Food Drying and Modeling

Papers in

    • Microbial Inactivation Methods 1.3k
    • Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety 430
    • Proteins in Food Systems 518
    • Microencapsulation and Drying Processes 487
    • Food Drying and Modeling 371

Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies

3.6k papers receiving 151.3k citations

Peers

Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies
Comparison fields: 5 of 221
  • Biotechnology 39.7k
  • Food Science 73.1k
  • Biochemistry 21.3k
  • Animal Science and Zoology 24.8k
  • Physiology 7.3k
Replace Ultrasonics Sonochemistry with:
Ultrasonics Sonochemistry China
Food and Bioprocess Technology China
International Journal of Food Science & Technology China
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition China
Journal of Food Processing and Preservation China
European Food Research and Technology Germany
Foods China
Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry Japan
Journal of Food Science and Technology India
Food Control China
Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies relative to Ultrasonics Sonochemistry China Ultrasonics Sonochemistry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies.

About Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies

The 3.8k papers published in Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies in the last decades have received a total of 155.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies usually cover Biotechnology (1.4k papers), Food Science (1.9k papers), Biochemistry (423 papers), Animal Science and Zoology (677 papers) and Physiology (269 papers) specifically the topics of Microbial Inactivation Methods (1.3k papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (667 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (518 papers), Microencapsulation and Drying Processes (487 papers), Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (430 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (395 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (386 papers) and Food Drying and Modeling (371 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies are Dietrich Knorr, Da‐Wen Sun, İlhami Gülçın, Oliver Schlüter, Joseph H. Hotchkiss, Di Wu, Darren Bates, Patrick J. Cullen, Lloyd Simons and Raymond Mawson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact