Ultrasonics Sonochemistry

6.6k papers and 280.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.6k papers published in Ultrasonics Sonochemistry in the last decades have received a total of 280.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Ultrasonics Sonochemistry usually cover Materials Chemistry (3.1k papers), Biomedical Engineering (2.0k papers) and Food Science (1.0k papers) specifically the topics of Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena (2.1k papers), Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (598 papers) and Microbial Inactivation Methods (517 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ultrasonics Sonochemistry are Parag R. Gogate, Muthupandian Ashokkumar, Timothy J. Mason, Aniruddha B. Pandit, Aharon Gedanken, Farid Chemat, Mircea Vînătoru, Mehrorang Ghaedi, Ali Morsali and Sivakumar Manickam.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ultrasonics Sonochemistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ultrasonics Sonochemistry.

Countries where authors publish in Ultrasonics Sonochemistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ultrasonics Sonochemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ultrasonics Sonochemistry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025