Food Technology and Biotechnology

736 papers and 12.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 736 papers published in Food Technology and Biotechnology in the last decades have received a total of 12.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Food Technology and Biotechnology usually cover Food Science (319 papers), Molecular Biology (241 papers) and Plant Science (166 papers) specifically the topics of Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (109 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (73 papers) and Probiotics and Fermented Foods (72 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Food Technology and Biotechnology are Maria Balcerek, Luc De Vuyst, Jagoda Šušković, Ashok Pandey, Blaženka Kos, Srećko Matošić, Verica Dragović‐Uzelac, Parameswaran Binod, Raveendran Sindhu and Amith Abraham.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Food Technology and Biotechnology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Food Technology and Biotechnology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Food Technology and Biotechnology.

Countries where authors publish in Food Technology and Biotechnology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Food Technology and Biotechnology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Food Technology and Biotechnology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Food Technology and Biotechnology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025