This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Food Structure. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Food Structure with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Food Structure more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Food Structure. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Food Structure.
About Food Structure
The 440 papers published in Food Structure in the last decades have received a total of 9.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Food Structure usually cover Food Science (342 papers), Nutrition and Dietetics (138 papers), Animal Science and Zoology (76 papers), Biomaterials (38 papers) and Computational Mathematics (1 paper) specifically the topics of Proteins in Food Systems (227 papers), Food composition and properties (119 papers), Polysaccharides Composition and Applications (101 papers), Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis (97 papers), Microencapsulation and Drying Processes (76 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (76 papers), Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization (36 papers) and Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (29 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Food Structure are Jianshe Chen, Alejandro G. Marangoni, Jie Hong Chiang, I. Heertje, David Julian McClements, Allan Hardacre, Michael E. Parker, Simon M. Loveday, Qian Liu and Jianchun Han.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.