Forum qualitative Sozialforschung

33.8k citations
1.9k papers · · active since 2000

Impact in

  • Education top 2%
    • Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
    • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
    • Educational Research and Methods
    • Qualitative research in health
    • Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
    • Participatory Visual Research Methods
    • Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
    • Data Analysis and Archiving

Papers in

    • Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics 401
    • Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods 125
    • Sociology and Education Studies 114
    • Participatory Visual Research Methods 108
    • Data Analysis and Archiving 105
    • Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice 66
    • Qualitative Research Methods and Applications 529
    • Qualitative research in health 122

Forum qualitative Sozialforschung

1.7k papers receiving 28.9k citations

Peers

Forum qualitative Sozialforschung
Comparison fields: 5 of 204
  • Education 7.8k
  • Sociology and Political Science 10.9k
  • General Social Sciences 512
  • Communication 1k
  • General Health Professions 2.1k
Replace The Qualitative Report with:
The Qualitative Report United States
Canadian Public Policy Canada
Qualitative Research United Kingdom
Qualitative Sociology United States
International Journal of Social Research Methodology United Kingdom
Social Science Information France
Sociological Research Online United Kingdom
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour United States
Human Organization United States
Critical Inquiry United States
Forum qualitative Sozialforschung relative to The Qualitative Report United States The Qualitative Report's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
The Qualitative Report · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Forum qualitative Sozialforschung

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Forum qualitative Sozialforschung. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Forum qualitative Sozialforschung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forum qualitative Sozialforschung more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Forum qualitative Sozialforschung

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Forum qualitative Sozialforschung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Forum qualitative Sozialforschung.

About Forum qualitative Sozialforschung

The 1.9k papers published in Forum qualitative Sozialforschung in the last decades have received a total of 33.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Forum qualitative Sozialforschung usually cover Sociology and Political Science (1.1k papers), Education (723 papers), General Psychology (29 papers), General Social Sciences (50 papers) and Linguistics and Language (44 papers) specifically the topics of Qualitative Research Methods and Applications (529 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (401 papers), Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (125 papers), Qualitative research in health (122 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (114 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (108 papers), Data Analysis and Archiving (105 papers) and Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (66 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Forum qualitative Sozialforschung are Philipp Mayring, Mark Mason, Barbara Kawulich, Florian Kohlbacher, Carolyn Ellis, Tony E. Adams, Arthur P. Bochner, Elaine Welsh, Barney G. Glaser and Margrit Schreier.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact