Countries where authors publish in Food Quality and Safety
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Food Quality and Safety. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Food Quality and Safety with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Food Quality and Safety more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Food Quality and Safety
This network shows the impact of papers published in Food Quality and Safety. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Food Quality and Safety.
About Food Quality and Safety
The 430 papers published in Food Quality and Safety in the last decades have received a total of 7.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Food Quality and Safety usually cover Biochemistry (45 papers), Food Science (141 papers), Biotechnology (64 papers), Plant Science (154 papers) and Nutrition and Dietetics (54 papers) specifically the topics of Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (52 papers), Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (39 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (37 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (36 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (24 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (23 papers), Food Safety and Hygiene (23 papers) and Microbial Inactivation Methods (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Food Quality and Safety are Alfredo Vázquez, Adrián Sánchez, Mehmet Seçkin Aday, Serpil Aday, Krishnapura Srinivasan, Yao Li, John Shi, M. Selvamuthukumaran, Tasleem A. Zafar and Jiwan S. Sidhu.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.