Methods of biochemical analysis

381 papers and 25.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 381 papers published in Methods of biochemical analysis in the last decades have received a total of 25.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Methods of biochemical analysis usually cover Molecular Biology (207 papers), Spectroscopy (108 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (31 papers) specifically the topics of Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (58 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (41 papers) and Protein Structure and Dynamics (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Methods of biochemical analysis are A.C. Maehly, Richard J. Winzler, Paul Talalay, J. E. Scott, Paige G. Andrew, Hamish N. Munro, A. Fleck, Lucile Smith, Maurice R. Eftink and H. G. Bray.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Methods of biochemical analysis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Methods of biochemical analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Methods of biochemical analysis.

Countries where authors publish in Methods of biochemical analysis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Methods of biochemical analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Methods of biochemical analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Methods of biochemical analysis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025