University of Central Florida

54.3k papers receiving 1.6M citations

Peers

University of Central Florida
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 5.1k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 60.9k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 47.5k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 77.6k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 98.2k
Replace Georgia Institute of Technology with:
Georgia Institute of Technology United States
Florida State University United States
University of South Florida United States
Virginia Tech United States
North Carolina State University United States
Clemson University United States
University of South Carolina United States
Auburn University United States
University of Tennessee at Knoxville United States
University of Maryland, College Park United States
University of Central Florida relative to Georgia Institute of Technology United States Georgia Institute of Technology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Georgia Institute of Technology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Central Florida

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Central Florida. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Central Florida with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Central Florida more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Central Florida

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Central Florida at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Central Florida at the time of their publication.

About University of Central Florida

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Central Florida have published 58.2k papers, which have received a total of 1.6M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 241 papers in Acoustics and Ultrasonics, 153 papers in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, 945 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 6.1k papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 2.2k papers in Social Psychology on the topics of Traffic and Road Safety (689 papers), Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research (636 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (621 papers), Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (606 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (513 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (492 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (484 papers) and Photonic Crystal and Fiber Optics (470 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Acoustics and Ultrasonics (5.1k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (60.9k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (47.5k citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (77.6k citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (98.2k citations). Authors at University of Central Florida collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Optics Letters, Optics Express, Applied Physics Letters, Applied Optics and Scientific Reports. Some of University of Central Florida's most productive authors include Mubarak A. Shah, Demetrios N. Christodoulides, Mohamed A. Abdel-Aty, Eduardo Salas A, Sudipta Seal, Shin-Tson T. Wu, Eric W. Van Stryland, Marie S. Mitchell, Shaun Gallagher and Peter A. Hancock.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact