University of Tennessee at Knoxville

3.1M citations
91.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of Tennessee at Knoxville

86.9k papers receiving 3.1M citations

Peers

University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Mechanical Engineering 200k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 54.9k
  • Materials Chemistry 208.2k
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 77k
  • Ecology 96.3k
Replace The Ohio State University with:
The Ohio State University United States
Virginia Tech United States
North Carolina State University United States
Purdue University West Lafayette United States
Duke University United States
Georgia Institute of Technology United States
University of Kentucky United States
University of Michigan United States
University of Florida United States
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign United States
University of Tennessee at Knoxville relative to The Ohio State University United States The Ohio State University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
The Ohio State University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Tennessee at Knoxville

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Tennessee at Knoxville. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Tennessee at Knoxville with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Tennessee at Knoxville more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Tennessee at Knoxville

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Tennessee at Knoxville at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Tennessee at Knoxville at the time of their publication.

About University of Tennessee at Knoxville

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Tennessee at Knoxville have published 91.1k papers, which have received a total of 3.1M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.5k papers in Small Animals, 336 papers in Equine, 2.7k papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 1.1k papers in Hardware and Architecture and 1.5k papers in Condensed Matter Physics on the topics of Nuclear physics research studies (1.6k papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (962 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (784 papers), High Entropy Alloys Studies (752 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (724 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (695 papers), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (683 papers) and Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (652 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Mechanical Engineering (200k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (54.9k citations), Materials Chemistry (208.2k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (77k citations) and Ecology (96.3k citations). Authors at University of Tennessee at Knoxville collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Physical Review C, Physical Review Letters, Physical Review B, Journal of Chromatography A and PLoS ONE. Some of University of Tennessee at Knoxville's most productive authors include Peter Kaehuei Liaw, Daniel Simberloff, Georges A. Guiochon, Michael L. McKinney, Jack J. Dongarra, David R. Bassett, Sheng Dai, Zhanhu Guo, E.P. George and George M. Pharr.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact