University of Tennessee at Knoxville

3.2M citations
97.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of Tennessee at Knoxville

88.7k papers receiving 3.0M citations

Peers

University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Materials Chemistry 330.1k
  • Ecology 179.6k
  • Mechanical Engineering 255.6k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 118.7k
  • Ecological Modeling 27.2k
Replace The Ohio State University with:
The Ohio State University United States
Virginia Tech United States
North Carolina State University United States
Purdue University West Lafayette United States
Duke University United States
University of Kentucky United States
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill United States
Georgia Institute of Technology United States
Clemson University United States
University of Virginia United States
University of Tennessee at Knoxville relative to The Ohio State University United States The Ohio State University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
The Ohio State University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Tennessee at Knoxville

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Tennessee at Knoxville. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Tennessee at Knoxville with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Tennessee at Knoxville more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Tennessee at Knoxville

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Tennessee at Knoxville at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Tennessee at Knoxville at the time of their publication.

About University of Tennessee at Knoxville

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Tennessee at Knoxville have published 97.8k papers, which have received a total of 3.2M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 330 papers in Equine, 2.4k papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 1.7k papers in Radiation, 2.3k papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 8.2k papers in Materials Chemistry on the topics of Nuclear physics research studies (1.2k papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (1.1k papers), Plant and animal studies (1.1k papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (1.1k papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (1.0k papers), High Entropy Alloys Studies (1.0k papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (947 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (942 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Materials Chemistry (330.1k citations), Ecology (179.6k citations), Mechanical Engineering (255.6k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (118.7k citations) and Ecological Modeling (27.2k citations). Authors at University of Tennessee at Knoxville collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Physical Review Letters, Physical Review B, Journal of Chromatography A, PLoS ONE and The Journal of Chemical Physics. Some of University of Tennessee at Knoxville's most productive authors include Daniel Simberloff, Georges Guiochon, Peter K. Liaw, Michael L. McKinney, David R. Bassett, Jack Dongarra, Sheng Dai, Zhanhu Guo, E.P. George and George M. Pharr.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact