University of South Florida

2.5M citations
80.5k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 1.1k
    • Eating Disorders and Behaviors 487
  • Health 1.2k

University of South Florida

70.1k papers receiving 2.3M citations

Peers

University of South Florida
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Clinical Psychology 162.3k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 69.1k
  • Oncology 141.7k
  • Biological Psychiatry 12.4k
  • Social Psychology 113.8k
Replace University of Florida with:
University of Florida United States
University of Miami United States
University of Georgia United States
Florida State University United States
University of South Carolina United States
Emory University United States
Tulane University United States
Duke University United States
Georgia Institute of Technology United States
Vanderbilt University United States
University of South Florida relative to University of Florida United States University of Florida's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
University of Florida · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of South Florida

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of South Florida. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of South Florida with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of South Florida more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of South Florida

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of South Florida at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of South Florida at the time of their publication.

About University of South Florida

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of South Florida have published 80.5k papers, which have received a total of 2.5M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4.6k papers in Clinical Psychology, 1.2k papers in Health, 3.8k papers in Oncology, 2.0k papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 2.9k papers in Social Psychology on the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1.1k papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (760 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (682 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (653 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (641 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (567 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (491 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (487 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Clinical Psychology (162.3k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (69.1k citations), Oncology (141.7k citations), Biological Psychiatry (12.4k citations) and Social Psychology (113.8k citations). Authors at University of South Florida collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Blood, Scientific Reports and Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Some of University of South Florida's most productive authors include Paul E. Spector, Vladimir N. Uversky, Wen‐Xiu Ma, Michael J. Zaworotko, Anol Bhattacherjee, Lawrence Hall, Tammy D. Allen, Kevin W. Bowyer, Alan R. Hevner and Dmitry I. Gabrilovich.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact