University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

9.6M citations
201.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

170.5k papers receiving 8.4M citations

Peers

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Molecular Biology 1.8M
  • Cancer Research 309.7k
  • Oncology 499.5k
  • Clinical Psychology 399.0k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 337.8k
Replace Duke University with:
Duke University United States
Johns Hopkins Medicine United States
University of Pittsburgh United States
University of Pennsylvania United States
Johns Hopkins University United States
Emory University United States
University of Virginia United States
The Ohio State University United States
Columbia University United States
Cornell University United States
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill relative to Duke University United States Duke University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Duke University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill at the time of their publication.

About University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill have published 201.1k papers, which have received a total of 9.6M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 7.6k papers in Infectious Diseases, 11.3k papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 9.8k papers in General Health Professions, 1.9k papers in Virology and 27.9k papers in Molecular Biology on the topics of HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (3.0k papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2.2k papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2.0k papers), HIV Research and Treatment (1.8k papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (1.7k papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1.7k papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (1.6k papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1.5k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Molecular Biology (1.8M citations), Cancer Research (309.7k citations), Oncology (499.5k citations), Clinical Psychology (399.0k citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (337.8k citations). Authors at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and China and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Biological Chemistry, PLoS ONE, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Blood and Journal of the American Chemical Society. Some of University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's most productive authors include Robert G. Parr, Weitao Yang, Chengteh Lee, Barry M. Popkin, Margarete Sandelowski, Albert S. Baldwin, Jeffery L. Dangl, Pranab Kumar Sen, Wenbin Lin and Keith Burridge.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact