University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Impact in
- Molecular Biology top 0.1%
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
- RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- RNA modifications and cancer
- Cancer Research top 0.1%
Papers in
- Infectious Diseases 7.0k
- HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions 2.7k
- Top scholars
- Robert G. ParrWeitao YangChengteh LeeBarry M. PopkinMargarete SandelowskiJeffery L. DanglAlbert S. BaldwinPranab Kumar Sen
- Journals
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (1.8k papers)PLoS ONE (1.7k papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1.1k papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (940 papers)Blood (926 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
166.6k papers receiving 8.0M citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
- Molecular Biology 1.7M
- Cancer Research 272.9k
- Clinical Psychology 385.8k
- Oncology 451.0k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 326.5k
Countries citing scholars working at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill at the time of their publication.
About University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill have published 197.7k papers, which have received a total of 9.0M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 7.0k papers in Infectious Diseases, 9.5k papers in General Health Professions, 10.6k papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 27.2k papers in Molecular Biology and 1.8k papers in Virology on the topics of HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (2.7k papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2.2k papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1.9k papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (1.6k papers), HIV Research and Treatment (1.6k papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1.6k papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (1.5k papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1.4k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Molecular Biology (1.7M citations), Cancer Research (272.9k citations), Clinical Psychology (385.8k citations), Oncology (451.0k citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (326.5k citations). Authors at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and China and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Biological Chemistry, PLoS ONE, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Blood. Some of University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's most productive authors include Robert G. Parr, Weitao Yang, Chengteh Lee, Barry M. Popkin, Margarete Sandelowski, Jeffery L. Dangl, Albert S. Baldwin, Pranab Kumar Sen, Wenbin Lin and Keith Burridge.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.