Florida State University

66.1k papers receiving 2.5M citations

Peers

Florida State University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 102.0k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 124.9k
  • Clinical Psychology 177.6k
  • Oceanography 108.9k
  • Applied Psychology 40.6k
Replace University of Georgia with:
University of Georgia United States
University of South Carolina United States
University of South Florida United States
Duke University United States
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill United States
University of Tennessee at Knoxville United States
University of Miami United States
Louisiana State University United States
Emory University United States
University of Alabama United States
Florida State University relative to University of Georgia United States University of Georgia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
University of Georgia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Florida State University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Florida State University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Florida State University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Florida State University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Florida State University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Florida State University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Florida State University at the time of their publication.

About Florida State University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Florida State University have published 73.4k papers, which have received a total of 2.6M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 3.5k papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 3.2k papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 4.7k papers in Clinical Psychology, 2.8k papers in Oceanography and 2.8k papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics on the topics of Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (1.9k papers), Climate variability and models (1.6k papers), Nuclear physics research studies (1.4k papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (1.3k papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1.2k papers), Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (1.2k papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (1.1k papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (1.1k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (102.0k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (124.9k citations), Clinical Psychology (177.6k citations), Oceanography (108.9k citations) and Applied Psychology (40.6k citations). Authors at Florida State University collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Physical Review C, Physical Review Letters, Physical Review B, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Journal of the American Chemical Society. Some of Florida State University's most productive authors include K. Anders Ericsson, Thomas Joiner, Roy Frederick Baumeister, J. Joseph Cronin, Alan G. Marshall, Ronald Earl Goldsmith, Daniel Simberloff, Christopher K. W. Tam, G. Tomas M. Hult and Sharon E. Nicholson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact