Tavistock Institute

7.4k citations
272 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Tavistock Institute

214 papers receiving 6.8k citations

Peers

Tavistock Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 192
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 978
  • Clinical Psychology 2.0k
  • Communication 457
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 330
  • Management Science and Operations Research 746
Replace Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership with:
Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership United Kingdom
Bournville College United Kingdom
Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology Netherlands
Staffordshire County Council United Kingdom
University Colleges Leuven-Limburg Belgium
Action for ME United Kingdom
Dublin Business School Ireland
Wales Institute of Social and Economic Research, Data and Methods United Kingdom
Montagu Hospital United Kingdom
CBS International Business School Germany
Tavistock Institute relative to Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership United Kingdom Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Tavistock Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Tavistock Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Tavistock Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tavistock Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Tavistock Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Tavistock Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Tavistock Institute at the time of their publication.

About Tavistock Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Tavistock Institute have published 272 papers, which have received a total of 7.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 6 papers in General Psychology, 63 papers in Clinical Psychology, 9 papers in Public Administration, 27 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 29 papers in Management Science and Operations Research on the topics of Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (27 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (17 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (16 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (15 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (12 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (11 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (10 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (9 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (978 citations), Clinical Psychology (2.0k citations), Communication (457 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (330 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (746 citations). Authors at Tavistock Institute collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including Human Relations, Evaluation, The British Journal of Psychiatry, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science and Journal of Social Work Practice. Some of Tavistock Institute's most productive authors include Colin Murray Parkes, Davide Nicolini, Silvia Gherardi, John Bowlby, Frank Heller, Matthew P J Ashby, Mark Easterby‐Smith, Mary Crossan, B. Benjamin and Ryan Fitzgerald.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact