University Colleges Leuven-Limburg

12.1k citations
347 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University Colleges Leuven-Limburg

286 papers receiving 10.4k citations

Peers

University Colleges Leuven-Limburg
Comparison fields: 5 of 229
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 1.7k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 944
  • Marketing 828
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 732
  • Ophthalmology 312
Replace Action for ME with:
Action for ME United Kingdom
Artesis Plantijn Hogeschool Antwerpen Belgium
Men's Health Forum United Kingdom
World Obesity Federation United Kingdom
United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration United Kingdom
Knowledge Integration (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Roosevelt Institute for American Studies Netherlands
Alice-Salomon-Hochschule Berlin Germany
European Food Information Council Belgium
Guildford Hospital United Kingdom
University Colleges Leuven-Limburg relative to Action for ME United Kingdom Action for ME's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Action for ME · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University Colleges Leuven-Limburg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University Colleges Leuven-Limburg. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University Colleges Leuven-Limburg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University Colleges Leuven-Limburg more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University Colleges Leuven-Limburg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University Colleges Leuven-Limburg at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University Colleges Leuven-Limburg at the time of their publication.

About University Colleges Leuven-Limburg

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University Colleges Leuven-Limburg have published 347 papers, which have received a total of 12.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 26 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 24 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 3 papers in Family Practice and 4 papers in Human Factors and Ergonomics on the topics of Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (19 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (8 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (8 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (7 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (7 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (7 papers), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (6 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (6 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Obstetrics and Gynecology (1.7k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (944 citations), Marketing (828 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (732 citations) and Ophthalmology (312 citations). Authors at University Colleges Leuven-Limburg collaborate with scholars in Belgium, Netherlands and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Midwifery, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Frontiers in Psychology and Obesity Facts. Some of University Colleges Leuven-Limburg's most productive authors include Ko de Ruyter, Josée Bloemer, Annick Bogaerts, Maurice P. Zeegers, Roland Devlieger, Nebojša Nick Knežević, Johan W.S. Vlaeyen, Jan Van Zundert, Kenneth D. Candido and Steven P. Cohen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact