Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership

11.4k citations
408 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership

323 papers receiving 8.3k citations

Peers

Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership
Comparison fields: 5 of 228
  • General Health Professions 1.4k
  • Research and Theory 49
  • Biochemistry 299
  • Management Science and Operations Research 627
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 236
Replace Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists with:
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists United Kingdom
RAND Europe United Kingdom
British Medical Association United Kingdom
Feminist Archive South United Kingdom
Leighton Hospital United Kingdom
Topcon (Netherlands) Netherlands
United BioSource Corporation (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Kings Mill Hospital United Kingdom
Office Of Health Economics United Kingdom
East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust United Kingdom
Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership relative to Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists United Kingdom Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.3×
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership at the time of their publication.

About Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership have published 408 papers, which have received a total of 11.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 3 papers in Research and Theory, 39 papers in Hematology, 21 papers in Biochemistry, 15 papers in Health Information Management and 67 papers in General Health Professions on the topics of Blood transfusion and management (21 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (17 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (13 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (13 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (12 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (12 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (11 papers) and Healthcare Quality and Management (11 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Health Professions (1.4k citations), Research and Theory (49 citations), Biochemistry (299 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (627 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (236 citations). Authors at Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including BMJ Open, Archives of Disease in Childhood, BMJ, Technometrics and Value in Health. Some of Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership's most productive authors include George E. P. Box, Jerard Seghatchian, R. Daniel Meyer, Cor J. Kalkman, Linda M. Peelen, Winfried Meißner, H. U. Gerbershagen, Albert J. M. van Wijck, Gill Harvey and Thierry Burnouf.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact