Texas A&M University

5.7M citations
171.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

  • Equine 769
    • Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods 2.0k
    • Drilling and Well Engineering 1.7k

Texas A&M University

157.3k papers receiving 5.4M citations

Peers

Texas A&M University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 182.9k
  • Global and Planetary Change 305.1k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 188.0k
  • Atmospheric Science 226.4k
  • Marketing 109.6k
Replace The University of Texas at Austin with:
The University of Texas at Austin United States
Louisiana State University United States
University of Houston United States
Rice University United States
University of Oklahoma United States
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign United States
Georgia Institute of Technology United States
University of Missouri United States
Texas Tech University United States
Iowa State University United States
Texas A&M University relative to The University of Texas at Austin United States The University of Texas at Austin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
The University of Texas at Austin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Texas A&M University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Texas A&M University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Texas A&M University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Texas A&M University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Texas A&M University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Texas A&M University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Texas A&M University at the time of their publication.

About Texas A&M University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Texas A&M University have published 171.2k papers, which have received a total of 5.7M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 769 papers in Equine, 6.3k papers in Ocean Engineering, 3.5k papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 7.4k papers in Global and Planetary Change and 6.6k papers in Computational Mechanics on the topics of Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (2.9k papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (2.0k papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (1.7k papers), Drilling and Well Engineering (1.7k papers), Climate variability and models (1.4k papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (1.4k papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (1.4k papers) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (1.4k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (182.9k citations), Global and Planetary Change (305.1k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (188.0k citations), Atmospheric Science (226.4k citations) and Marketing (109.6k citations). Authors at Texas A&M University collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Animal Science, Journal of the American Chemical Society, PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Crop Science. Some of Texas A&M University's most productive authors include Jay B. Barney, Hong‐Cai Zhou, Leonard L. Berry, Guoyao Wu, J. N. Reddy, Stephen Safe, A. Parasuraman, Valarie A. Zeithaml, Michael A. Hitt and D. Wayne Goodman.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact