University of Missouri

3.2M citations
95.4k papers ·

Impact in

  • Plant Science top 0.2%
    • Plant Molecular Biology Research
    • Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
    • Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
    • Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
    • Reproductive Physiology in Livestock

Papers in

University of Missouri

91.2k papers receiving 3.2M citations

Peers

University of Missouri
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Plant Science 267.6k
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 57.3k
  • Social Psychology 108.4k
  • Clinical Psychology 96.1k
  • Molecular Biology 266.9k
Replace Purdue University West Lafayette with:
Purdue University West Lafayette United States
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign United States
Iowa State University United States
Washington University in St. Louis United States
University of Nebraska–Lincoln United States
University of Minnesota United States
University of Wisconsin–Madison United States
University of Iowa United States
University of Kentucky United States
University of Chicago United States
University of Missouri relative to Purdue University West Lafayette United States Purdue University West Lafayette's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Purdue University West Lafayette · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Missouri

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Missouri. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Missouri with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Missouri more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Missouri

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Missouri at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Missouri at the time of their publication.

About University of Missouri

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Missouri have published 95.4k papers, which have received a total of 3.2M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.1k papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 1.4k papers in Small Animals, 35 papers in Nuclear Energy and Engineering, 295 papers in Equine and 5.6k papers in Plant Science on the topics of Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (1k papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (778 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (614 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (599 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (574 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (568 papers), Soybean genetics and cultivation (554 papers) and Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (543 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Plant Science (267.6k citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (57.3k citations), Social Psychology (108.4k citations), Clinical Psychology (96.1k citations) and Molecular Biology (266.9k citations). Authors at University of Missouri collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Animal Science, PLoS ONE, Crop Science, Journal of Dairy Science and Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. Some of University of Missouri's most productive authors include Nelson Cowan, David C. Geary, Kennon M. Sheldon, Richard E. Petty, John T. Cacioppo, James R. Sowers, Jere R. Francis, Kenneth J. Sher, Frederick S. vom Saal and Timothy J. Trull.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact