Physical review. C

86.7k citations
7.7k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Nuclear physics research studies
    • Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
    • High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
    • Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
    • Astronomical and nuclear sciences
  • Radiation top 1%
    • Nuclear Physics and Applications

Papers in

    • Nuclear physics research studies 5.0k
    • Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions 3.2k
    • High-Energy Particle Collisions Research 1.9k
    • Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies 1.8k
    • Astronomical and nuclear sciences 1.5k
    • Nuclear Physics and Applications 1.1k

Physical review. C

7.1k papers receiving 84.0k citations

Peers

Physical review. C
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 75.2k
  • Radiation 10.5k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 14.6k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 23.9k
  • Geophysics 5.1k
Replace Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics with:
Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics United States
Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion United States
The European Physical Journal A Germany
IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science United States
Canadian Journal of Physics Canada
Computer Physics Communications United States
Nuclear Fusion United States
Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A Germany
Journal of the Franklin Institute China
IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science United States
Physical review. C relative to Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics United States Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Physical review. C

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Physical review. C. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Physical review. C with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Physical review. C more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Physical review. C

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Physical review. C. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Physical review. C.

About Physical review. C

The 7.7k papers published in Physical review. C in the last decades have received a total of 86.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Physical review. C usually cover Nuclear and High Energy Physics (7.0k papers), Radiation (1.2k papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (2.7k papers), Astronomy and Astrophysics (775 papers) and Spectroscopy (628 papers) specifically the topics of Nuclear physics research studies (5.0k papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (3.2k papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (1.9k papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (1.8k papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (1.6k papers), Astronomical and nuclear sciences (1.5k papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (1.1k papers) and Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (775 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Physical review. C are Chun Shen, W. Nazarewicz, A. Schwenk, J. Piekarewicz, Björn Schenke, J. Margueron, Sanjay Reddy, Jacquelyn Noronha-Hostler, F. Gulminelli and Ingo Tews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact