University School of Nashville

22.3k citations
723 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University School of Nashville

595 papers receiving 19.8k citations

Peers

University School of Nashville
Comparison fields: 5 of 236
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 2.5k
  • Clinical Psychology 2.8k
  • Applied Psychology 653
  • Education 3.3k
  • Social Psychology 1.9k
Replace Georgia Department of Education with:
Georgia Department of Education United States
Individual Differences United States
Antioch College United States
Bellarmine University United States
Jacksonville State University United States
DePauw University United States
Governors State University United States
South Carolina Department of Education United States
Kentucky Department of Education United States
The Chicago School United States
University School of Nashville relative to Georgia Department of Education United States Georgia Department of Education's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Georgia Department of Education · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University School of Nashville

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University School of Nashville. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University School of Nashville with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University School of Nashville more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University School of Nashville

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University School of Nashville at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University School of Nashville at the time of their publication.

About University School of Nashville

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University School of Nashville have published 723 papers, which have received a total of 22.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 89 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 73 papers in Clinical Psychology, 66 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 94 papers in Education and 60 papers in Social Psychology on the topics of Behavioral and Psychological Studies (31 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (30 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (29 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (21 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (20 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (19 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (17 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (14 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental and Educational Psychology (2.5k citations), Clinical Psychology (2.8k citations), Applied Psychology (653 citations), Education (3.3k citations) and Social Psychology (1.9k citations). Authors at University School of Nashville collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including The Spine Journal, Exceptional Children, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Peabody Journal of Education and The American Journal of Surgery. Some of University School of Nashville's most productive authors include Barbara Strudler Wallston, Kenneth A. Wallston, Lloyd M. Dunn, Robert F. DeVellis, Paul Cobb, David Lubinski, Fang Yan, D. Brent Polk, Richard H. Porter and William B. Dragoin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact