Individual Differences

29.3k citations
1.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Individual Differences

842 papers receiving 26.1k citations

Peers

Individual Differences
Comparison fields: 5 of 236
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 3.8k
  • Applied Psychology 892
  • Clinical Psychology 3.5k
  • Social Psychology 3.6k
  • Gastroenterology 826
Replace Clarke University with:
Clarke University United States
Chicago State University United States
University of Evansville United States
University School of Nashville United States
Lake Forest College United States
Truman State University United States
Addiction Research Foundation United States
Stanley Foundation United States
Emory and Henry College United States
The Chicago School United States
Individual Differences relative to Clarke University United States Clarke University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Clarke University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Individual Differences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Individual Differences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Individual Differences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Individual Differences more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Individual Differences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Individual Differences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Individual Differences at the time of their publication.

About Individual Differences

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Individual Differences have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 29.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 140 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 33 papers in Applied Psychology, 132 papers in Clinical Psychology, 20 papers in Behavioral Neuroscience and 120 papers in Social Psychology on the topics of Mental Health Research Topics (64 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (38 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (25 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (24 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (20 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (20 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (19 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (19 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (3.8k citations), Applied Psychology (892 citations), Clinical Psychology (3.5k citations), Social Psychology (3.6k citations) and Gastroenterology (826 citations). Authors at Individual Differences collaborate with scholars in United States, Belgium and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Medicine, Scientific Reports, Criminology, Educational Researcher and Journal of Learning Disabilities. Some of Individual Differences's most productive authors include Offie P. Soldin, Patricia A. Alexander, Kathryn Sandberg, Lyn Corno, Donald R. Mattison, Eiko I. Fried, Randolph M. Nesse, Hong Ji, Agnes Moors and Janis E. Jacobs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact