The Chicago School

19.8k citations
856 papers ·

Impact in

    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
    • Child Abuse and Trauma
    • Migration, Health and Trauma
    • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Health top 10%
    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence

Papers in

The Chicago School

731 papers receiving 17.1k citations

Peers

The Chicago School
Comparison fields: 5 of 214
  • Clinical Psychology 6.3k
  • Health 1.2k
  • Social Psychology 3.3k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.7k
  • Applied Psychology 572
Replace Individual Differences with:
Individual Differences United States
Clarke University United States
Governors State University United States
Kentucky Department of Education United States
State Library of Ohio United States
Michigan Department of Education United States
Indiana University Southeast United States
Adolescent Health Clinic United States
University School of Nashville United States
Missouri Institute of Mental Health United States
The Chicago School relative to Individual Differences United States Individual Differences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Individual Differences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at The Chicago School

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at The Chicago School. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at The Chicago School with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Chicago School more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at The Chicago School

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with The Chicago School at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with The Chicago School at the time of their publication.

About The Chicago School

In recent decades, authors affiliated with The Chicago School have published 856 papers, which have received a total of 19.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 313 papers in Clinical Psychology, 17 papers in General Psychology, 47 papers in Applied Psychology, 124 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 166 papers in Social Psychology on the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (93 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (79 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (61 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (57 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (40 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (40 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (35 papers) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (32 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Clinical Psychology (6.3k citations), Health (1.2k citations), Social Psychology (3.3k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.7k citations) and Applied Psychology (572 citations). Authors at The Chicago School collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Clinical Psychology, Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, Journal of Personality Assessment, The Psychological Record and Behavioral Interventions. Some of The Chicago School's most productive authors include Victoria Clarke, Virginia Braun, Annette K. Griffith, Robert J. Craig, Hector Y. Adames, Nayeli Y. Chavez‐Dueñas, Philip Adu, Christoph Leonhard, Mary E. Connors and Steve Spaccarelli.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact