National Opinion Research Center

1.3k papers receiving 42.4k citations

Peers

National Opinion Research Center
Comparison fields: 5 of 229
  • Health 6.0k
  • General Health Professions 8.1k
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 490
  • Gender Studies 3.1k
  • Aging 520
Replace VA Center for Clinical Management Research with:
VA Center for Clinical Management Research United States
American Medical Association United States
University of Wisconsin Health United States
Xavier University United States
American Bar Foundation United States
Illinois Department of Public Health United States
Individual Differences United States
University of Southern Indiana United States
The Chicago School United States
Emory and Henry College United States
National Opinion Research Center relative to VA Center for Clinical Management Research United States VA Center for Clinical Management Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
VA Center for Clinical Management Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Opinion Research Center

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Opinion Research Center. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Opinion Research Center with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Opinion Research Center more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Opinion Research Center

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Opinion Research Center at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Opinion Research Center at the time of their publication.

About National Opinion Research Center

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Opinion Research Center have published 1.6k papers, which have received a total of 53.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 169 papers in Health, 17 papers in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, 242 papers in General Health Professions, 179 papers in Clinical Psychology and 67 papers in Statistics and Probability on the topics of Health disparities and outcomes (86 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (66 papers), Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (65 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (53 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (51 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (44 papers), School Choice and Performance (43 papers) and Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (42 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health (6.0k citations), General Health Professions (8.1k citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (490 citations), Gender Studies (3.1k citations) and Aging (520 citations). Authors at National Opinion Research Center collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Current Opinion in Psychiatry, Public Opinion Quarterly, The Journals of Gerontology Series B, Health Affairs and Journal of the American Statistical Association. Some of National Opinion Research Center's most productive authors include Tom Smith, Roger Tourangeau, Benjamin I. Page, Robert Y. Shapiro, Kenneth A. Rasinski, Louise C. Hawkley, Linda J. Waite, Robert J. Mislevy, Andrew M. Greeley and John P. Hoffmann.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact