Current Opinion in Psychiatry

2.9k papers and 72.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.9k papers published in Current Opinion in Psychiatry in the last decades have received a total of 72.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Opinion in Psychiatry usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.2k papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (915 papers) and General Health Professions (346 papers) specifically the topics of Schizophrenia research and treatment (418 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (298 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (291 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Opinion in Psychiatry are Hans W. Hoek, Frank J. Penedo, Jason R. Dahn, Jukka Leppänen, Grant L. Iverson, Ronald C. Kessler, Anna Keski‐Rahkonen, Christine Dunkel Schetter, Daniel Ciccarone and G. Paul Amminger.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Opinion in Psychiatry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Opinion in Psychiatry.

Countries where authors publish in Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Opinion in Psychiatry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Opinion in Psychiatry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Opinion in Psychiatry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025