American Medical Association

107.4k citations
2.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

American Medical Association

1.6k papers receiving 73.8k citations

Peers

American Medical Association
Comparison fields: 5 of 240
  • Family Practice 1.7k
  • General Health Professions 21.4k
  • Health Informatics 1.3k
  • Health Information Management 3.2k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 17.3k
Replace Regenstrief Institute with:
Regenstrief Institute United States
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System United States
VA Center for Clinical Management Research United States
Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center United States
HealthPartners United States
University of Wisconsin Health United States
University of Missouri Health System United States
Vanderbilt Health United States
Chicago Department of Public Health United States
Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital United States
American Medical Association relative to Regenstrief Institute United States Regenstrief Institute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Regenstrief Institute · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at American Medical Association

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at American Medical Association. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at American Medical Association with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Medical Association more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at American Medical Association

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with American Medical Association at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with American Medical Association at the time of their publication.

About American Medical Association

In recent decades, authors affiliated with American Medical Association have published 2.1k papers, which have received a total of 107.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 42 papers in Family Practice, 556 papers in General Health Professions, 98 papers in Pharmacy, 138 papers in Emergency Medical Services and 5 papers in Medical Terminology on the topics of Innovations in Medical Education (215 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (160 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (146 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (138 papers), Ethics in medical practice (97 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (86 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (79 papers) and Health and Medical Research Impacts (77 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Family Practice (1.7k citations), General Health Professions (21.4k citations), Health Informatics (1.3k citations), Health Information Management (3.2k citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (17.3k citations). Authors at American Medical Association collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including JAMA, Academic Medicine, Journal of General Internal Medicine, The American Journal of Bioethics and Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Some of American Medical Association's most productive authors include Christine A. Sinsky, Wayne H. Giles, Earl S. Ford, William H. Dietz, Tait D. Shanafelt, Liselotte N. Dyrbye, Colin P. West, Thomas Bodenheimer, Daniel Satele and John Carew Eccles.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact