American Bar Foundation

83.1k citations
1.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

  • Law 325
    • Legal Education and Practice Innovations 160
    • Judicial and Constitutional Studies 98
    • Law in Society and Culture 72
    • Comparative and International Law Studies 43
    • Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems 111

American Bar Foundation

1.2k papers receiving 77.2k citations

Peers

American Bar Foundation
Comparison fields: 5 of 238
  • Safety Research 6.0k
  • Health 5.2k
  • Sociology and Political Science 31.9k
  • Gender Studies 6.0k
  • General Decision Sciences 1.2k
Replace National Opinion Research Center with:
National Opinion Research Center United States
Roosevelt University United States
Xavier University United States
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars United States
Radford University United States
Davidson College United States
Butler University United States
United States Department of Justice United States
University of Wisconsin–Parkside United States
Economic Policy Institute United States
American Bar Foundation relative to National Opinion Research Center United States National Opinion Research Center's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.9×
National Opinion Research Center · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at American Bar Foundation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at American Bar Foundation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at American Bar Foundation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Bar Foundation more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at American Bar Foundation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with American Bar Foundation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with American Bar Foundation at the time of their publication.

About American Bar Foundation

In recent decades, authors affiliated with American Bar Foundation have published 1.4k papers, which have received a total of 83.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 325 papers in Law, 288 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 229 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 76 papers in Gender Studies and 362 papers in Sociology and Political Science on the topics of Legal Education and Practice Innovations (160 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (111 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (98 papers), Law in Society and Culture (72 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (67 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (56 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (53 papers) and Comparative and International Law Studies (43 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Safety Research (6.0k citations), Health (5.2k citations), Sociology and Political Science (31.9k citations), Gender Studies (6.0k citations) and General Decision Sciences (1.2k citations). Authors at American Bar Foundation collaborate with scholars in United States, Germany and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Law & Social Inquiry, Journal of Bacteriology, Journal of Food Science, Law & Society Review and Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society. Some of American Bar Foundation's most productive authors include James J. Heckman, Robert J. Sampson, Stephen W. Raudenbush, E. Allan Lind, Tom R. Tyler, Steven D. Levitt, Felton J. Earls, Michael Greenstone, Austan Goolsbee and Edward Vytlacil.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact