Commonwealth Fund
Impact in
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Healthcare cost, quality, practices
- Global Health Care Issues
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Papers in
-
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 190
- Global Health Care Issues 60
- Healthcare cost, quality, practices 40
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 23
-
- Healthcare Policy and Management 298
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 44
- Top scholars
- Michelle M. DotyCathy SchoenKaren DavisKarl ClaxtonRobin OsbornDavid SquiresSara R. CollinsMary Jane Koren
- Journals
- Health Affairs (80 papers)New England Journal of Medicine (41 papers)Journal of General Internal Medicine (14 papers)Health Services Research (13 papers)Journal of Urban Health (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Commonwealth Fund
561 papers receiving 19.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 219
- General Health Professions 8.9k
- Health Information Management 1.1k
- Economics and Econometrics 5.7k
- Family Practice 272
- Emergency Medical Services 722
Countries citing scholars working at Commonwealth Fund
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Commonwealth Fund. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Commonwealth Fund with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Commonwealth Fund more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Commonwealth Fund
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Commonwealth Fund at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Commonwealth Fund at the time of their publication.
About Commonwealth Fund
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Commonwealth Fund have published 715 papers, which have received a total of 26.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 320 papers in General Health Professions, 318 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 37 papers in Emergency Medical Services, 21 papers in Health Information Management and 5 papers in Family Practice on the topics of Healthcare Policy and Management (298 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (190 papers), Global Health Care Issues (60 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (44 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (40 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (28 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (23 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (20 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Health Professions (8.9k citations), Health Information Management (1.1k citations), Economics and Econometrics (5.7k citations), Family Practice (272 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (722 citations). Authors at Commonwealth Fund collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Health Affairs, New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Health Services Research and Journal of Urban Health. Some of Commonwealth Fund's most productive authors include Michelle M. Doty, Cathy Schoen, Karen Davis, Karl Claxton, Robin Osborn, David Squires, Sara R. Collins, Mary Jane Koren, David Blumenthal and Stephen C. Schoenbaum.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.