Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Impact in
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Health Policy Implementation Science
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Family Practice top 10%
Papers in
-
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement 36
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 28
- Health Policy Implementation Science 25
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 24
- Top scholars
- Laura P. ForsytheJoe V. SelbyLori FrankBridget GaglioRussell E. GlasgowJulia H. RowlandPaul A. EstabrooksSamantha M. Harden
- Journals
- Medicine (26 papers)Medical Care (14 papers)Value in Health (12 papers)Journal of General Internal Medicine (12 papers)JAMA (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
523 papers receiving 18.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 200
- General Health Professions 4.2k
- Family Practice 235
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 353
- Oncology 2.5k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2.5k
Countries citing scholars working at Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute at the time of their publication.
About Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute have published 699 papers, which have received a total of 25.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 134 papers in General Health Professions, 8 papers in Family Practice, 79 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 64 papers in Oncology and 8 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology on the topics of Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (67 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (39 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (36 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (28 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (25 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (24 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (19 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (16 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Health Professions (4.2k citations), Family Practice (235 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (353 citations), Oncology (2.5k citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (2.5k citations). Authors at Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and France and have published in prestigious journals including Medicine, Medical Care, Value in Health, Journal of General Internal Medicine and JAMA. Some of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute's most productive authors include Laura P. Forsythe, Joe V. Selby, Lori Frank, Bridget Gaglio, Russell E. Glasgow, Julia H. Rowland, Paul A. Estabrooks, Samantha M. Harden, Rachael Fleurence and Borsika A. Rabin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.