Quality Enhancement Research Initiative

41.9k citations
1.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Quality Enhancement Research Initiative

801 papers receiving 30.0k citations

Peers

Quality Enhancement Research Initiative
Comparison fields: 5 of 232
  • General Health Professions 8.6k
  • Applied Psychology 966
  • Rehabilitation 1.2k
  • Health Information Management 766
  • Biotechnology 1.4k
Replace VA Maryland Health Care System with:
VA Maryland Health Care System United States
National Academy of Medicine United States
North Carolina Division of Public Health United States
Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island United States
Office of the Director United States
Centre for Global Health Research Canada
New York Academy of Medicine United States
Indian Health Service United States
United States Army Medical Research and Development Command United States
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health United States
Quality Enhancement Research Initiative relative to VA Maryland Health Care System United States VA Maryland Health Care System's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
VA Maryland Health Care System · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Quality Enhancement Research Initiative

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Quality Enhancement Research Initiative. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Quality Enhancement Research Initiative with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quality Enhancement Research Initiative more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Quality Enhancement Research Initiative

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Quality Enhancement Research Initiative at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Quality Enhancement Research Initiative at the time of their publication.

About Quality Enhancement Research Initiative

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Quality Enhancement Research Initiative have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 41.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 249 papers in General Health Professions, 8 papers in Family Practice, 17 papers in Occupational Therapy, 132 papers in Epidemiology and 25 papers in Rehabilitation on the topics of Health Policy Implementation Science (120 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (51 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (42 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (30 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (29 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (23 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (22 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (21 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Health Professions (8.6k citations), Applied Psychology (966 citations), Rehabilitation (1.2k citations), Health Information Management (766 citations) and Biotechnology (1.4k citations). Authors at Quality Enhancement Research Initiative collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Implementation Science, American Journal of Health Promotion, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Medical Care and BMC Health Services Research. Some of Quality Enhancement Research Initiative's most productive authors include Laura J. Damschroder, Jeffrey L. Smith, George N. Ioannou, Hildi Hagedorn, Mark S. Bauer, Byron J. Powell, Thomas J. Waltz, Enola K. Proctor, JoAnn E. Kirchner and Matthew Chinman.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact