National Committee for Quality Assurance
Impact in
- Health Information Management top 10%
- Electronic Health Records Systems
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Papers in
-
- Healthcare Quality and Management 12
- Electronic Health Records Systems 11
-
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 49
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 25
- Top scholars
- Sarah Hudson ScholleL. Gregory PawlsonWilliam E. PerryThomas Ho-yin LeeJanet M. CorriganAlla L LapidusVictor KuninPatricia A. Cluss
- Journals
- Medical Care (16 papers)Health Affairs (14 papers)Health Services Research (11 papers)International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics (10 papers)International Journal for Quality in Health Care (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
National Committee for Quality Assurance
378 papers receiving 7.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
- Health Information Management 506
- General Health Professions 2.0k
- Health 565
- Family Practice 113
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 204
Countries citing scholars working at National Committee for Quality Assurance
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Committee for Quality Assurance. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Committee for Quality Assurance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Committee for Quality Assurance more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Committee for Quality Assurance
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Committee for Quality Assurance at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Committee for Quality Assurance at the time of their publication.
About National Committee for Quality Assurance
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Committee for Quality Assurance have published 541 papers, which have received a total of 10.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 25 papers in Health Information Management, 106 papers in General Health Professions, 4 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 5 papers in Family Practice and 26 papers in Analytical Chemistry on the topics of Primary Care and Health Outcomes (49 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (47 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (25 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (21 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (20 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (13 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (12 papers) and Electronic Health Records Systems (11 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health Information Management (506 citations), General Health Professions (2.0k citations), Health (565 citations), Family Practice (113 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (204 citations). Authors at National Committee for Quality Assurance collaborate with scholars in United States, India and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Medical Care, Health Affairs, Health Services Research, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and International Journal for Quality in Health Care. Some of National Committee for Quality Assurance's most productive authors include Sarah Hudson Scholle, L. Gregory Pawlson, William E. Perry, Thomas Ho-yin Lee, Janet M. Corrigan, Alla L Lapidus, Victor Kunin, Patricia A. Cluss, Lynn Hawker and Judy C. Chang.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.