American College of Physicians
Impact in
- Internal Medicine top 10%
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Papers in
-
- Healthcare cost, quality, practices 47
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 44
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 87
- Clinical practice guidelines implementation 57
- Ethics and bioethics in healthcare 35
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 26
- Top scholars
- Amir QaseemMary Ann ForcieaPaul ShekelleVincenza T. SnowDouglas K OwensTimothy J WiltDouglas G. AltmanThomas D. Denberg
- Journals
- Annals of Internal Medicine (450 papers)Journal of the American College of Radiology (67 papers)Journal of General Internal Medicine (37 papers)The American Journal of Medicine (21 papers)New England Journal of Medicine (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
American College of Physicians
932 papers receiving 64.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 213
- Internal Medicine 877
- Pharmacology 4.3k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 8.7k
- General Health Professions 5.7k
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 5.6k
Countries citing scholars working at American College of Physicians
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at American College of Physicians. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at American College of Physicians with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American College of Physicians more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at American College of Physicians
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with American College of Physicians at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with American College of Physicians at the time of their publication.
About American College of Physicians
In recent decades, authors affiliated with American College of Physicians have published 1k papers, which have received a total of 64.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 172 papers in General Health Professions, 246 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 2 papers in Medical Terminology, 10 papers in Family Practice and 8 papers in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology on the topics of Innovations in Medical Education (87 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (58 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (57 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (47 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (44 papers), Ethics and bioethics in healthcare (35 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (26 papers) and Diversity and Career in Medicine (24 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Internal Medicine (877 citations), Pharmacology (4.3k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (8.7k citations), General Health Professions (5.7k citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (5.6k citations). Authors at American College of Physicians collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Annals of Internal Medicine, Journal of the American College of Radiology, Journal of General Internal Medicine, The American Journal of Medicine and New England Journal of Medicine. Some of American College of Physicians's most productive authors include Amir Qaseem, Mary Ann Forciea, Paul Shekelle, Vincenza T. Snow, Douglas K Owens, Timothy J Wilt, Douglas G. Altman, Thomas D. Denberg, Cynthia D. Mulrow and Roger Chou.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.