American College of Physicians

653 papers receiving 39.1k citations

Peers

American College of Physicians
Comparison fields: 5 of 227
  • Family Practice 520
  • Internal Medicine 925
  • General Health Professions 5.5k
  • Pharmacology 3.5k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 5.5k
Replace Quality Enhancement Research Initiative with:
Quality Enhancement Research Initiative United States
Highland Hospital United States
Office of Patient Care Services United States
American College of Cardiology United States
Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program Canada
Ottawa Public Health Canada
North Carolina Division of Public Health United States
Evidence Based Research (United States) United States
Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates United States
Baystate Health United States
American College of Physicians relative to Quality Enhancement Research Initiative United States Quality Enhancement Research Initiative's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.0×
Quality Enhancement Research Initiative · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at American College of Physicians

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at American College of Physicians. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at American College of Physicians with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American College of Physicians more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at American College of Physicians

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with American College of Physicians at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with American College of Physicians at the time of their publication.

About American College of Physicians

In recent decades, authors affiliated with American College of Physicians have published 813 papers, which have received a total of 51.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 18 papers in Family Practice, 194 papers in General Health Professions, 26 papers in Pharmacy, 140 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 124 papers in Economics and Econometrics on the topics of Healthcare cost, quality, practices (75 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (75 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (67 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (60 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (40 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (31 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (24 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (20 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Family Practice (520 citations), Internal Medicine (925 citations), General Health Professions (5.5k citations), Pharmacology (3.5k citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (5.5k citations). Authors at American College of Physicians collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Annals of Internal Medicine, Journal of the American College of Radiology, Journal of General Internal Medicine, The American Journal of Medicine and New England Journal of Medicine. Some of American College of Physicians's most productive authors include Amir Qaseem, Vincenza Snow, Timothy J Wilt, Mary Ann Forciea, Robert McLean, Douglas K Owens, Paul Shekelle, Steven E. Weinberger, Harold C. Sox and Cynthia D. Mulrow.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact