Baylor University

19.4k papers receiving 530.8k citations

Peers

Baylor University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 14.9k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 19.5k
  • Marketing 10.7k
  • Health 9.6k
  • Pollution 11.6k
Replace The University of Texas at Arlington with:
The University of Texas at Arlington United States
University of North Texas United States
Rice University United States
University of Houston United States
University of Oklahoma United States
The University of Texas at Dallas United States
Oklahoma State University United States
Southern Methodist University United States
The University of Texas at San Antonio United States
Texas Tech University United States
Baylor University relative to The University of Texas at Arlington United States The University of Texas at Arlington's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
The University of Texas at Arlington · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Baylor University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Baylor University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Baylor University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Baylor University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Baylor University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Baylor University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Baylor University at the time of their publication.

About Baylor University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Baylor University have published 21k papers, which have received a total of 531.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 537 papers in Health, 339 papers in Religious studies, 281 papers in Environmental Chemistry, 672 papers in Social Psychology and 240 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation on the topics of Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (390 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (233 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (217 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (206 papers), Nonlinear Differential Equations Analysis (193 papers), Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (171 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (159 papers) and Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (156 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Management of Technology and Innovation (14.9k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (19.5k citations), Marketing (10.7k citations), Health (9.6k citations) and Pollution (11.6k citations). Authors at Baylor University collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Scientific Reports, Physical review. D, Experimental Biology and Medicine and Environmental Science & Technology. Some of Baylor University's most productive authors include Dorothy E. Leidner, Dawn S. Carlson, Bryan W. Brooks, Matthew S. Stanford, Jeffery S. McMullen, Jim H. Patton, Kwang Y. Lee, Roger E. Kirk, Marley W. Watkins and Ernest S. Barratt.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact