The University of Texas at Dallas

1.0M citations
34.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

The University of Texas at Dallas

31.2k papers receiving 986.7k citations

Peers

The University of Texas at Dallas
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Geophysics 55.4k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 73.1k
  • Accounting 40.9k
  • Strategy and Management 53.9k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 180.1k
Replace University of Houston with:
University of Houston United States
Rice University United States
Texas Tech University United States
The University of Texas at Arlington United States
Southern Methodist University United States
The University of Texas at San Antonio United States
University of North Texas United States
University of Memphis United States
University of Alabama United States
John Brown University United States
The University of Texas at Dallas relative to University of Houston United States University of Houston's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
University of Houston · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at The University of Texas at Dallas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at The University of Texas at Dallas. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at The University of Texas at Dallas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The University of Texas at Dallas more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at The University of Texas at Dallas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with The University of Texas at Dallas at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with The University of Texas at Dallas at the time of their publication.

About The University of Texas at Dallas

In recent decades, authors affiliated with The University of Texas at Dallas have published 34.1k papers, which have received a total of 1.0M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.5k papers in Signal Processing, 3.0k papers in Computer Networks and Communications, 6.9k papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 838 papers in Hardware and Architecture and 2.2k papers in Cognitive Neuroscience on the topics of Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (888 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (869 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (737 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (717 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (647 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (590 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (580 papers) and Supply Chain and Inventory Management (559 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Geophysics (55.4k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (73.1k citations), Accounting (40.9k citations), Strategy and Management (53.9k citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (180.1k citations). Authors at The University of Texas at Dallas collaborate with scholars in United States, China and South Korea and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Geophysics and Management Science. Some of The University of Texas at Dallas's most productive authors include Robert J. Stern, Ray H. Baughman, Hervé Abdi, Mike W. Peng, Lynne J. Williams, Anvar Zakhidov, Robert M. Wallace, Kenneth J. Balkus, Kyeongjae Cho and A. Dean Sherry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact