The University of Texas at San Antonio

872.2k citations
30.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

The University of Texas at San Antonio

26.9k papers receiving 812.2k citations

Peers

The University of Texas at San Antonio
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Inorganic Chemistry 64.2k
  • Computer Networks and Communications 48.3k
  • Materials Chemistry 85.7k
  • Information Systems 42.9k
  • Aging 3.1k
Replace University of Houston with:
University of Houston United States
University of North Texas United States
Rice University United States
The University of Texas at Dallas United States
University of Oklahoma United States
Texas A&M University United States
The University of Texas at Arlington United States
Texas Tech University United States
Louisiana State University United States
The University of Texas at Austin United States
The University of Texas at San Antonio relative to University of Houston United States University of Houston's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
University of Houston · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at The University of Texas at San Antonio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at The University of Texas at San Antonio. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at The University of Texas at San Antonio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The University of Texas at San Antonio more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at The University of Texas at San Antonio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with The University of Texas at San Antonio at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with The University of Texas at San Antonio at the time of their publication.

About The University of Texas at San Antonio

In recent decades, authors affiliated with The University of Texas at San Antonio have published 30.4k papers, which have received a total of 872.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.9k papers in Computer Networks and Communications, 793 papers in Signal Processing, 513 papers in Health, 485 papers in Hardware and Architecture and 1.5k papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition on the topics of Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (493 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (468 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (464 papers), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (455 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (445 papers), Cryptography and Data Security (431 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (426 papers) and Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (374 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Inorganic Chemistry (64.2k citations), Computer Networks and Communications (48.3k citations), Materials Chemistry (85.7k citations), Information Systems (42.9k citations) and Aging (3.1k citations). Authors at The University of Texas at San Antonio collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, The Astrophysical Journal, Geophysical Research Letters, Scientific Reports and IEEE Access. Some of The University of Texas at San Antonio's most productive authors include Banglin Chen, Kim‐Kwang Raymond Choo, Guodong Qian, George Perry, Robert H. Lengel, Richard L. Daft, Wei Zhou, Shengchang Xiang, Yuanjing Cui and Christopher G. Reddick.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact