Environmental Science & Technology

3.3M citations
49.4k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
    • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Pollution top 0.02%
    • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
    • Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
    • Heavy metals in environment

Papers in

    • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact 6.7k
    • Air Quality and Health Impacts 4.7k
    • Mercury impact and mitigation studies 2.4k
    • Water Treatment and Disinfection 2.2k
    • Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology 2.0k
  • Pollution 10.8k
    • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts 2.6k
    • Heavy metals in environment 2.6k

Environmental Science & Technology

45.8k papers receiving 3.2M citations

Peers

Environmental Science & Technology
Comparison fields: 5 of 248
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 1.1M
  • Pollution 885.1k
  • Environmental Chemistry 451.8k
  • Water Science and Technology 563.7k
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 317.4k
Replace The Science of The Total Environment with:
The Science of The Total Environment China
Chemosphere China
Water Research China
Journal of Hazardous Materials China
Environmental Pollution China
Environmental Science and Pollution Research China
Applied and Environmental Microbiology United States
Chemical Engineering Journal China
Journal of Cleaner Production China
Bioresource Technology China
Environmental Science & Technology relative to The Science of The Total Environment China The Science of The Total Environment's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
The Science of The Total Environment · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Environmental Science & Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Environmental Science & Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Environmental Science & Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environmental Science & Technology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Environmental Science & Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Environmental Science & Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Environmental Science & Technology.

About Environmental Science & Technology

The 49.4k papers published in Environmental Science & Technology in the last decades have received a total of 3.3M indexed citations . Papers published in Environmental Science & Technology usually cover Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (17.1k papers), Pollution (10.8k papers), Environmental Chemistry (6.4k papers), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (4.0k papers) and Water Science and Technology (6.2k papers) specifically the topics of Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (6.7k papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (5.4k papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (4.7k papers), Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (2.6k papers), Heavy metals in environment (2.6k papers), Mercury impact and mitigation studies (2.4k papers), Water Treatment and Disinfection (2.2k papers) and Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (2.0k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Environmental Science & Technology are Menachem Elimelech, Bruce E. Logan, Kurunthachalam Kannan, Ronald A. Hites, Baoshan Xing, Joseph J. Pignatello, Urs von Gunten, Kevin C. Jones, Glen R. Cass and David L. Sedlak.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact