Texas Tech University

1.6M citations
64.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Texas Tech University

56.1k papers receiving 1.5M citations

Peers

Texas Tech University
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 59.7k
  • Marketing 41.0k
  • Social Psychology 77.8k
  • Information Systems and Management 25.9k
  • Ecological Modeling 14.6k
Replace University of Oklahoma with:
University of Oklahoma United States
Oklahoma State University United States
University of North Texas United States
The University of Texas at Arlington United States
The University of Texas at Austin United States
University of Houston United States
Kansas State University United States
University of New Mexico United States
University of Colorado Boulder United States
Texas A&M University United States
Texas Tech University relative to University of Oklahoma United States University of Oklahoma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
University of Oklahoma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Texas Tech University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Texas Tech University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Texas Tech University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Texas Tech University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Texas Tech University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Texas Tech University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Texas Tech University at the time of their publication.

About Texas Tech University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Texas Tech University have published 64.2k papers, which have received a total of 1.6M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.9k papers in Social Psychology, 2.3k papers in Clinical Psychology, 1.1k papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 166 papers in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management and 964 papers in Gender Studies on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (691 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (555 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (533 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (496 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (454 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (453 papers), Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (445 papers) and Animal Nutrition and Physiology (443 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (59.7k citations), Marketing (41.0k citations), Social Psychology (77.8k citations), Information Systems and Management (25.9k citations) and Ecological Modeling (14.6k citations). Authors at Texas Tech University collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Animal Science, PLoS ONE, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Journal of Mammalogy and Applied Physics Letters. Some of Texas Tech University's most productive authors include Shelby D. Hunt, Robert M. Morgan, Mica R. Endsley, W. J. Conover, Peter H. Westfall, James J. Sheng, P. Hemachandra Reddy, Gregory B. McKenna, Purnendu Κ. Dasgupta and Frank Bretz.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact