Texas Tech University

53.7k papers receiving 1.5M citations

Peers

Texas Tech University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 36.2k
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 2.9k
  • Marketing 21.1k
  • Social Psychology 46.4k
  • Plant Science 78.2k
Replace Oklahoma State University with:
Oklahoma State University United States
The University of Texas at Austin United States
University of North Texas United States
Colorado State University United States
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville United States
University of Oklahoma United States
Kansas State University United States
University of Colorado Boulder United States
Texas A&M University United States
University of New Mexico United States
Texas Tech University relative to Oklahoma State University United States Oklahoma State University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Oklahoma State University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Texas Tech University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Texas Tech University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Texas Tech University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Texas Tech University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Texas Tech University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Texas Tech University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Texas Tech University at the time of their publication.

About Texas Tech University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Texas Tech University have published 57.3k papers, which have received a total of 1.5M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 109 papers in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, 1.8k papers in Social Psychology, 724 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 1.5k papers in Clinical Psychology and 584 papers in Communication on the topics of Pulsed Power Technology Applications (491 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (414 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (405 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (402 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (399 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (366 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (313 papers) and Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (310 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (36.2k citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (2.9k citations), Marketing (21.1k citations), Social Psychology (46.4k citations) and Plant Science (78.2k citations). Authors at Texas Tech University collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Animal Science, The Journal of Chemical Physics, PLoS ONE, Applied Physics Letters and Journal of Mammalogy. Some of Texas Tech University's most productive authors include Shelby D. Hunt, Robert M. Morgan, Mica Robertson Endsley, William Jay Conover, Peter H. Westfall, James J. Sheng, Preetam Reddy, Gregory B. McKenna, Frank Bretz and Torsten Hothorn.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact