University of Oklahoma

1.8M citations
56.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of Oklahoma

51.0k papers receiving 1.6M citations

Peers

University of Oklahoma
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Global and Planetary Change 179.4k
  • Atmospheric Science 144.7k
  • Environmental Engineering 77.6k
  • Ecology 133.1k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 49.3k
Replace Texas A&M University with:
Texas A&M University United States
University of Nebraska–Lincoln United States
The University of Texas at Austin United States
University of Kansas United States
Texas Tech University United States
Kansas State University United States
Oklahoma State University United States
University of Missouri United States
Louisiana State University United States
Iowa State University United States
University of Oklahoma relative to Texas A&M University United States Texas A&M University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Texas A&M University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Oklahoma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Oklahoma. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Oklahoma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Oklahoma more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Oklahoma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Oklahoma at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Oklahoma at the time of their publication.

About University of Oklahoma

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Oklahoma have published 56.8k papers, which have received a total of 1.8M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4.4k papers in Atmospheric Science, 4.5k papers in Global and Planetary Change, 3.0k papers in Ocean Engineering, 2.2k papers in Environmental Engineering and 1.6k papers in Geophysics on the topics of Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (2.9k papers), Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (2.0k papers), Climate variability and models (1.8k papers), Drilling and Well Engineering (1.4k papers), Precipitation Measurement and Analysis (1.2k papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (1.0k papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (948 papers) and Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques (912 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Global and Planetary Change (179.4k citations), Atmospheric Science (144.7k citations), Environmental Engineering (77.6k citations), Ecology (133.1k citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (49.3k citations). Authors at University of Oklahoma collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Monthly Weather Review, Weather and Forecasting, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres and American Journal of Botany. Some of University of Oklahoma's most productive authors include Yiqi Luo, Jizhong Z. Zhou, Daniel E. Resasco, Michael D. Mumford, C. W. Bert, Faruk Civan, Ming Xue, Douglas K. Lilly, David London and Richard Fowler.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact