Xiaopeng Ren

1.4k citations
54 papers · 988 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Xiaopeng Ren

47 papers receiving 952 citations

Peers

Xiaopeng Ren
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Applied Psychology 100
  • Social Psychology 393
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 153
  • Clinical Psychology 210
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 105
Replace Natasha M. Loi with:
Natasha M. Loi Australia
Jon Jachimowicz United States
Carrie S. Hurst United States
Fabrizio Scrima France
Joseph N. Luchman United States
Amery D. Wu Canada
John Adams Egypt
Stephen L. Wright United States
Deirdre O’Shea Ireland
Zhenyu Yuan United States
Xiaopeng Ren relative to Natasha M. Loi Australia Natasha M. Loi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Natasha M. Loi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiaopeng Ren

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaopeng Ren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaopeng Ren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaopeng Ren more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaopeng Ren

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaopeng Ren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaopeng Ren. The network helps show where Xiaopeng Ren may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiaopeng Ren, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiaopeng Ren Line = papers co-authored together Xiaopeng Ren links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010166
2 201079
3 201271
4 200963
5 201060
6 201059
7 200748
8 202047
9 201833
10 201031
11 202128
12 202328
13 201925
14 202322
15 201622
16 201721
17 202117
18 201916
19 202414
20 201512

About Xiaopeng Ren

Xiaopeng Ren is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and General Health Professions, having authored 54 papers that have together received 988 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Differences and Values (19 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (12 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (5 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (3 papers) and International Student and Expatriate Challenges (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (100 citations), Social Psychology (393 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (153 citations), Clinical Psychology (210 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (105 citations). Xiaopeng Ren has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Xinwen Bai, Chia‐Huei Wu, Cynthia Lee, Guohua Huang, Li‐Lin Rao, Shu Li, Jin‐Zhen Li, Susan J. Ashford, Zuo‐Jun Wang and Yongli Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, PLoS ONE, Social Psychological and Personality Science, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology and Frontiers in Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact